Make it lighter. Make it smaller. Make it more efficient. And make it reliable. Oh, and did we mention, don’t sacrifice performance? Today, automotive engineers and project managers must produce powertrains that deliver optimum fuel efficiency and long-term reliability without sacrificing performance. Meanwhile, global initiatives to reduce emissions and improve energy conservation have expanded the role of hybrid powertrains. Working with hybrids presents additional challenges, as engineers must combine gas and electric systems inside the limited space afforded by modern, aerodynamically designed frames and bodywork.
In response, auto designers have initiated comprehensive
Sealing ports inside thinner, lighter base materials pose several challenges:
- Stresses that sealing elements apply to base materials
- Using enough force to properly set seals while minimizing effects on surrounding systems
- Production factors: potential contaminants from manufacturing processes; time, resource requirements for port machining, sealing element installation
- Reliability, warranty costs, quality, consistency of sealing elements; related production costs for sealing solutions
Greg Kozlowski, application engineer at metal-to-metal sealing and flow control products producer SFC Koenig has worked with major automotive manufacturers to provide critical sealing solutions for drilled ports in a wide variety of compact, lightweight alloy powertrain applications.
In the past, Kozlowski explains, products such as cup plugs, ball plugs, and threaded fasteners (screw plugs) were the most common methods of sealing ports. Those low-cost solutions, however, are not suitable for thin-wall applications. The high-stress installation forces needed to seat a cup, ball, or screw can deform and crack the surrounding material. Also, screws require tapping the port and may need sealant application, adding production steps that can lead to contamination from debris or sealant entering the fluid system.
Many low-cost plugs have less-precise production tolerances, resulting in part-to-part size variation. In a high-volume production environment, where port diameters are drilled to exact tolerances across multiple assemblies, size variation in the sealing plugs can prove costly. A plug that is too small will leak, and one that is too large may damage the base as it is installed.
“Customers who relied on
Expansion plugs employ an expandable, serrated outer shell that is activated by a pre-assembled, metal ball or mandrel. The plug is positioned in the port and then set into place by pushing the ball or pulling the mandrel into the shell with a hand-held or automated tool. The shell expands radially, causing its serrated edges to press against the port wall, creating a leak-proof metal-to-metal seal with evenly distributed pressures.
“In addition to their low-stress capabilities, expander plugs are generally easy to position and install, with precisely controlled stroke distances,” Kozlowski notes. “They’re especially valuable for deep or angled ports, or for complex port layouts where alignment is difficult or additional machining is not possible.”
Installing plugs without detriment to surrounding materials is critical when working with today’s lightweight metal alloys and thin-wall ports. Kozlowski points out that expansion-style plugs are manufactured to precise tolerances, allowing for tightly controlled stresses on surrounding materials, while providing a proven leak-proof seal.
Engineers can further adjust the pressures applied to port walls by slightly increasing the diameter of the port bore, relative to the expander plug. If the resultant port bore diameter is not larger than a specified limit of the shell’s expansion range, a secure seal is typically possible.
“We take a collaborative three-level approach in working with customers to arrive at a reliable and cost-effective sealing solution for low-stress applications,” Kozlowski says.
Level 1: Apply off-the-shelf products from standard inventory for the lowest-cost solution. If installation stress levels are too high, the engineering team may recommend design adjustments to the base component, such as increasing port bore diameters to allow the standard solution to work.
Level 2: Use a custom solution based on a minor design derivative of the standard sealing product to meet application requirements.
Level 3: SFC Koenig engineers can develop a completely custom part using Expander technology.
Even with advanced sealing technologies, engineers must be vigilant when specifications call for installation of a
The company’s engineers recently developed a custom solution, working with a major automaker, to seal ports in an aluminum alloy transmission housing that contained a bearing shaft. Due to the position of installation and the stress requirements, engineers designed a custom expander using a low-stress pin design instead of a ball. This custom solution created a reliable seal with very low stresses on port walls – sealing ports in the housing and preventing sidewalls from deforming and interfering with the bearing shaft.
Testing is essential when developing such sealing solutions.
“We work closely with customers to thoroughly test solutions before making any recommendations,” Kozlowski says. “When we receive designs and specifications from the customer, we go through an extensive evaluation process. We begin with theoretical testing and modeling. We identify potential products that meet application requirements and calculate the effects of installation and the expected performance. If our theoretical tests are successful, we move to practical tests. We work with customers to source base materials and test the performance of the sealing products in the alloys the customer will be using in final production.”
Any plug that relies on friction and outward pressure to form a seal will apply stress to the base material. To minimize stress and maximize seal performance, there are limits to how thin a port wall can be to maintain its integrity during plug installation and subsequent pressurized operation. According to Kozlowski, “Installations in applications with wall thicknesses that are less than 65% of the bore diameter can be achieved, but they require special consideration.”
Application engineers often conduct destructive tests on base alloys to identify the physical limits of the sealing product and the base materials. Destructive tests that take materials to their limits help engineers understand and optimize long-term reliability of sealing solutions. This is important because a leaking seal, especially across an entire product line, can lead to increased warranty costs for automakers.
Engineers also must consider production costs in their specification process. Scrapping components damaged during seal installation adds time and material costs, so low-stress expansion seal technologies can reduce waste by lowering scrap rates.
One-piece plugs arrive ready for installation with a flexible tolerance range up to 0.12mm for pull-style Expander plugs and up to 0.10mm for push-style plugs. While advanced sealing technologies typically cost more per part than the traditional cup, ball, and screw methods, costs are offset by the reduction in waste and production time.
“The No. 1 objective of all sealing methods is providing a reliable, leak-proof seal,” Kozlowski explains. “While our Expander plugs provide a variety of benefits in
Advances in sealing technology and the ongoing development and re-engineering of the smallest system components contribute to success in modern vehicle